By Errol E. Harris
From the Preface:
The function of this remark is to render Hegel’s good judgment intelligible to the uninitiated and to dispel the varied misconceptions that have amassed round it and round Hegel's philosophy quite often. No test has been made to track traditionally the advance of the good judgment via its a variety of models, or to provide a biographical account of Hegel’s philosophical improvement. This has been performed via different writers with whom i've got no wish to compete. My item has been basically to know the kernel of Hegel’s proposal and to penetrate, as far as i will, the obscurities of his writing, in addition to, the place beneficial and potential, to provide an explanation for and kind out a few obvious anomalies within the association of the fabric.
Read or Download An Interpretation of the Logic of Hegel PDF
Similar logic & language books
Computability and common sense has turn into a vintage due to its accessibility to scholars with no mathematical heritage and since it covers no longer easily the staple subject matters of an intermediate common sense path, resembling Godel's incompleteness theorems, but additionally a lot of not obligatory subject matters, from Turing's concept of computability to Ramsey's theorem.
The Symbolic varieties has lengthy been thought of the best of Cassirer’s works. Into it he poured the entire assets of his titanic studying approximately language and fantasy, faith, artwork, and science—the a variety of artistic symbolizing actions and structures during which guy has expressed himself and given intelligible target shape to this event.
- Logic machines and diagrams
- Temporal Modalities in Arabic Logic
- Descartes' System of Natural Philosophy
- Hilbert’s Program: An Essay on Mathematical Instrumentalism
Extra info for An Interpretation of the Logic of Hegel
The counterexamples have partly fixed the agenda for mainstream epistemological research since. The Gettier paradoxes often involve the derivation of something true from something false. Smith may have in the past collected firm evidence that, together with other relevant background information, , furnish supportive reasons for or perhaps even deductively entail the following hypothesis about Jones’s possessions with respect to automotive vehicles: h 1 : Jones owns a Ford car. Suppose Smith has an acquaintance, Brown.
Forcing may Priming the Pump 19 sound defensive in this respect, but it comfortably leaves room for, endorses, and encourages the great variety of modern studies of dynamic epistemics and doxastics characteristic of a ‘new’ epistemology. In fact, by the end of the day, forcing may be viewed as a methodological feature rather than an epistemological one encompassing the statics as well as the dynamics of knowledge and other epistemic and doxastic attitudes relevant to epistemology (see Chapter 9).
There is a similar distinction in moral philosophy between descriptive and normative ethics. The former attempts to describe actual moral behavior whereas the latter sets the standards for correct moral conduct. Similarly, descriptive epistemologies account for actual epistemic practice whereas normative epistemologies prescribe rules of inquiry, including mechanisms for avoiding error and gaining truth, truth-conducive justification criteria, learning and winning strategies, procedures for revising beliefs, and so on.